September 07, 2026
ANVISA Guidance Manuals for IVD Regularization, Class I–II Medical Device Notification, GMP, Company Authorization & Post-Market Regulatory Actions
Brazil's medical device market continues to attract global manufacturers seeking access to one of Latin America's largest healthcare markets. However, successful commercialization requires manufacturers, importers, and local representatives to understand ANVISA's regulatory classification, regularization, notification, documentation, GMP, company authorization, and post-market requirements.
On 25 August 2026, National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) released new guidance manuals addressing the regulatory regularization of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices and the notification of Class I–II medical devices.
The manuals consolidate regulatory procedures and provide practical instructions for preparing petitions, submitting documentation, managing post-market changes, and avoiding inconsistencies that may result in requirements or rejection.
For manufacturers and Brazilian legal representatives, the updated manuals are particularly relevant because they clarify the regulatory pathway, documentation expectations, company authorization requirements, electronic submission process, and post-market petitioning activities.
Why ANVISA Medical Device Compliance Matters
Key compliance areas include:
- Product regulatory classification
- Regularization pathway
- Notification requirements
- Technical documentation
- Company authorization
- AFE requirements
- Local sanitary licensing
- Brazilian legal representation
- GMP compliance
- CBPF requirements
- Electronic petitioning
- Post-market changes
- Ownership transfers
- Cancellations
- Revalidation
- Regulatory lifecycle management
Failure to follow the applicable requirements can result in summary rejection, technical requirements, submission delays, additional regulatory work, market-entry delays, or difficulties maintaining the product's regulatory status.
ANVISA's New Guidance Manuals
The August 2026 update covers two important regulatory areas.
1. Manual for Regularization of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
This manual addresses the regularization of IVD products under RDC 830/2023, including applicable registration and notification procedures and related post-market petitions.
2. Manual for Regularization of Materials for Health Use Subject to the Notification Regime
This manual addresses the notification of applicable Class I and Class II medical devices under RDC 751/2022.
Together, the manuals are intended to consolidate regulatory instructions and help manufacturers, importers, and Brazilian legal representatives submit more complete and consistent petitions.
Purpose of the ANVISA Manuals
The updated manuals are designed to provide greater clarity regarding:
- Applicable regulatory pathways
- Petition selection
- Required documentation
- Electronic submission
- Company requirements
- Technical information
- Post-market petitions
- Regulatory modifications
- Cancellation procedures
- Ownership transfers
- Revalidation requirements
The practical objective is to reduce incomplete submissions, inconsistencies, avoidable technical requirements, rework, and rejection.
IVD Regulatory Framework in Brazil
Companies placing IVD products on the Brazilian market should first establish the regulatory status of the product.
The process generally requires companies to:
Determine whether the product falls within the IVD regulatory framework.
- Classify the IVD according to applicable rules.
- Determine whether registration or notification applies.
- Identify the correct petition.
- Confirm company authorization requirements.
- Prepare technical documentation.
- Submit electronically through the applicable ANVISA system.
- Monitor the petition.
- Respond appropriately to regulatory requirements when applicable.
- Maintain regulatory status throughout the product lifecycle.
Incorrect classification or selection of the wrong petition can create significant regulatory delays.
Class I–II Medical Device Notification
For applicable medical devices regulated under the notification regime, manufacturers and importers should confirm the product's classification and determine whether notification is appropriate under RDC 751/2022.
The notification pathway does not eliminate the manufacturer's responsibility for:
- Product safety
- Performance
- Technical documentation
- GMP compliance
- Traceability
- Post-market compliance
- Change management
Companies should therefore treat notification as a regulatory pathway rather than as an exemption from ongoing compliance obligations.
Company Authorization Requirements
Appropriate company authorization is a fundamental component of Brazilian medical-device compliance.
For IVD applicants, companies should assess requirements involving:
- Company registration
- AFE — Authorization for Operation
- Local sanitary license
- Brazilian legal representative
- Technical responsibility
Foreign manufacturers generally require an appropriately established Brazilian company to act as the local regulatory/legal representative and assume applicable technical and legal responsibilities.
Before initiating product regularization, companies should verify that the local entity has the required authorization and licensing status.
AFE and Local Sanitary Licensing
The Company Operating Authorization (AFE) is an important component of the Brazilian regulatory framework for companies conducting regulated activities.
Manufacturers, importers, and other regulated entities should ensure that their corporate authorization and sanitary licensing are appropriate for the activities they intend to perform.
Product submission should therefore not be considered independently from the company's regulatory status.
Company authorization + product regularization + technical compliance should be managed as an integrated regulatory strategy.
GMP and CBPF Requirements
Good Manufacturing Practices remain a significant requirement for medical devices and IVD products.
Applicable GMP requirements are established under RDC 665/2022.
For registerable IVD products, the Good Manufacturing Practices Certificate (CBPF) is required as applicable to the regulatory pathway.
For notified products, GMP obligations still apply even where CBPF documentation is not submitted as part of the notification.
This distinction is important because absence of a CBPF submission does not mean that GMP requirements do not apply.
Companies should maintain appropriate GMP systems, manufacturing controls, quality records, supplier controls, complaint procedures, and traceability mechanisms.
IVD Technical Documentation
A complete IVD submission should be supported by the documentation applicable to the product and regulatory pathway.
Companies should assess:
- Product description
- Intended purpose
- Classification
- Technical characteristics
- Performance information
- Manufacturing information
- Labelling
- Instructions for use
- Risk-related information
- Quality documentation
- Applicable certificates
- Company authorization documents
The regulatory dossier should be internally consistent across technical, administrative, manufacturing, and labelling information.
IVD Submission Completeness
One of the important practical considerations emphasized by the updated guidance is the importance of submission completeness at the initial filing stage.
Where required technical documentation is missing, the petition may be subject to summary rejection rather than a subsequent technical requirement process.
This makes pre-submission document verification particularly important.
Companies should therefore conduct a structured completeness check before electronic filing.
Recommended Pre-Submission Check
Classification → Petition type → Company authorization → Technical documents → Labelling → GMP/CBPF status → Administrative documents → Electronic submission
This approach can reduce avoidable deficiencies and rework.
SOLICITA Electronic Petitioning
Applicable ANVISA regulatory petitions are submitted electronically through the agency's systems, including SOLICITA, for relevant procedures.
Companies should:
- Identify the correct service
- Select the appropriate petition
- Complete required information
- Upload supporting documentation
- Review data consistency
- Submitting electronically
- Monitor petition status
- Manage regulatory communications
Incorrect service selection or incomplete documentation can undermine an otherwise technically strong submission.
Post-Market Regulatory Petitions
The new manuals also address important lifecycle activities after initial regularization.
Applicable post-market activities may include:
- Changes and amendments
- Additions
- Cancellations
- Transfer of ownership
- Revalidation
- Other regulatory updates
The IVD manual additionally addresses revalidation and other post-registration procedures.
Companies should establish formal change-control procedures so that regulatory consequences are assessed before implementing commercial or manufacturing changes.
IVD Registration Validity
For applicable registered IVD products, registration is generally valid for 10 years.
Companies should plan revalidation within the applicable regulatory window.
Revalidation should be filed between 6 and 12 months before the registration expires.
A regulatory calendar should therefore include:
- Registration approval date
- Expiry date
- Revalidation filing window
- Required supporting documents
- Post-market changes
- Manufacturer changes
- Ownership changes
Early preparation reduces the risk of interruption to regulatory status.
Notification Validity
Unlike registered products, applicable notified medical devices have indefinite validity and are not subject to periodic revalidation.
However, indefinite validity does not eliminate lifecycle responsibilities.
Companies should continue monitoring:
- Product changes
- Manufacturing changes
- Legal representative changes
- Labelling
- Regulatory requirements
- GMP compliance
- Post-market safety
- Traceability
Regulatory Classification
Correct classification remains one of the most important steps in Brazilian market access.
Companies should assess:
- Intended purpose
- Risk classification
- Technology
- Mode of action
- Duration of use
- Target population
- Clinical application
- IVD-specific characteristics
Incorrect classification can result in the selection of an inappropriate regulatory pathway and may contribute to rejection or significant rework.
Labelling and Technical Consistency
Product labelling should remain consistent with the regulatory documentation submitted to ANVISA.
Companies should verify:
- Product name
- Intended purpose
- Manufacturer
- Brazilian legal representative
- Instructions for use
- Warnings
- Technical information
- Identification information
- Applicable regulatory information
Any change to commercial artwork should undergo regulatory assessment before implementation.
ANVISA 2026 Regulatory Readiness Assessment
| Assessment Area | Objective |
| Product Classification | Select the correct regulatory pathway |
| Regulatory Status | Determine registration or notification |
| Petition Selection | Avoid incorrect service selection |
| Company Authorization | Confirm AFE and sanitary licence |
| Local Representation | Establish Brazilian responsibility |
| Technical Documentation | Ensure submission completeness |
| GMP | Maintain RDC 665/2022 compliance |
| CBPF | Determine applicable certification requirements |
| Labelling | Maintain regulatory consistency |
| SOLICITA Submission | Submit the correct electronic petition |
| Post-Market Changes | Control regulatory modifications |
| Ownership Transfer | Maintain legal regulatory status |
| Revalidation | Protect IVD registration continuity |
| Notification | Maintain indefinite validity requirements |
| Post-Market Monitoring | Support ongoing compliance |
ANVISA Medical Device Compliance Roadmap
| Activity | Timing | Benefit |
| Classification | Before submission | Correct pathway |
| Regulatory-status assessment | Early development | Avoid incorrect petitioning |
| Company authorization | Before filing | Submission readiness |
| Technical dossier review | Before submission | Reduce deficiencies |
| GMP assessment | Before commercialization | Quality compliance |
| CBPF assessment | Where applicable | Registration readiness |
| Labelling review | Before production | Product consistency |
| SOLICITA petition | Before market entry | Regulatory submission |
| ANVISA review | Post-submission | Manage regulatory process |
| Post-market change review | Every change | Lifecycle compliance |
| Revalidation | 6–12 months before expiry | Maintain IVD registration |
| Regulatory monitoring | Ongoing | Proactive compliance |
| Internal audit | Periodically | Inspection readiness |
Common ANVISA Compliance Challenges
Companies commonly face:
- Incorrect product classification
- Wrong petition selection
- Incomplete technical documentation
- Inconsistent product information
- Missing company authorization
- Inadequate local representation
- GMP documentation gaps
- CBPF misunderstandings
- Labelling inconsistencies
- Incorrect electronic submissions
- Failure to manage post-market changes
- Missed IVD revalidation timelines
- Weak regulatory change control
Best Practices & Common Mistakes
Organizations should determine regulatory status early, confirm classification, establish the correct Brazilian legal representative, verify AFE and sanitary licensing, prepare complete technical documentation, assess GMP and CBPF requirements, conduct a petition-level completeness review, verify labelling consistency, and establish lifecycle change-control procedures.
Avoid submitting incomplete technical dossiers, selecting an incorrect petition, assuming notification eliminates GMP obligations, overlooking company authorization requirements, implementing changes without regulatory assessment, or waiting until registration expiry to begin revalidation preparation.
Business Benefits of ANVISA Regulatory Readiness
| Business Function | Key Benefit |
| Regulatory Affairs | Reduced submission risk |
| Quality | Stronger GMP compliance |
| R&D | Better regulatory pathway planning |
| Manufacturing | Improved product consistency |
| Clinical | Better evidence alignment |
| Supply Chain | Improved market-entry readiness |
| Legal | Stronger local representation |
| Commercial | Reduced launch delays |
| Leadership | Better regulatory visibility |
Future Trends
Brazil's medical-device regulatory environment is likely to continue emphasizing:
- Digital regulatory submissions
- Regulatory standardization
- Risk-based classification
- Technical-document completeness
- GMP compliance
- Lifecycle management
- Post-market surveillance
- Electronic regulatory processes
- Product traceability
- Regulatory transparency
The August 2026 manuals demonstrate ANVISA's continuing effort to consolidate practical regulatory instructions and improve the consistency of medical-device and IVD submissions.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What did ANVISA release on August 25, 2026?
ANVISA released new guidance manuals covering IVD regularization and the notification of applicable Class I–II medical devices.
2. Which regulation applies to IVD regularization?
The IVD pathway is addressed under RDC 830/2023.
3. Which regulation applies to Class I–II medical-device notification?
The notification framework is addressed under RDC 751/2022.
4. What is the purpose of the new manuals?
They consolidate regulatory instructions to help manufacturers, importers, and legal representatives prepare more complete and consistent petitions and reduce avoidable rework, requirements, and rejection.
5. Are post-market activities covered?
Yes. The manuals address applicable amendments, additions, cancellations, ownership transfers, and other lifecycle procedures. The IVD manual also covers revalidation and additional post-registration activities.
6. Is CBPF required for all products?
Requirements depend on the regulatory pathway. For registerable IVDs, applicable CBPF requirements apply. Notified products remain subject to GMP requirements even where CBPF is not submitted.
7. What happens if an IVD submission is incomplete?
Missing required technical documentation at initial filing can result in summary rejection, rather than necessarily generating a technical requirement.
8. How long is IVD registration valid?
Applicable IVD registration is generally valid for 10 years.
9. When should IVD revalidation be submitted?
Revalidation should be planned within the applicable 6–12-month period before expiry.
10. Do notified medical devices require revalidation?
Applicable notified products have indefinite validity and are not subject to periodic revalidation.
11. Do foreign manufacturers need a Brazilian company?
Foreign manufacturers generally need an appropriately established Brazilian legal representative to undertake applicable local technical and legal responsibilities.
12. What is SOLICITA?
SOLICITA is an electronic platform used for applicable ANVISA regulatory petitioning and submission procedures.
13. Does notification mean GMP is not required?
No. Products subject to notification remain subject to applicable GMP obligations even where CBPF is not submitted.
14. How should companies prepare for the new guidance?
Begin with classification, regulatory-status assessment, company authorization, petition selection, technical-document review, GMP/CBPF assessment, labelling verification, electronic submission, and lifecycle change control.
15. How can Maven Regulatory Solutions help?
Maven Regulatory Solutions can support ANVISA regulatory strategy, medical-device and IVD classification, RDC 830/2023 and RDC 751/2022 pathway assessment, technical documentation review, AFE and local-representative assessment, GMP/CBPF strategy, submission readiness, post-market changes, revalidation planning, regulatory gap assessments, and Brazil market-entry strategy.
Conclusion
ANVISA's 25 August 2026 guidance manuals provide an important practical reference for companies seeking to regularize IVDs and notify applicable Class I–II medical devices in Brazil.
The updated approach reinforces the importance of correct classification, appropriate petition selection, complete technical documentation, company authorization, Brazilian legal representation, GMP compliance, electronic submission, and lifecycle management.
For IVD manufacturers, particular attention should be given to registration validity, the 6–12-month revalidation window, CBPF requirements, and the consequences of incomplete initial submissions.
For notified medical devices, companies should understand that indefinite validity does not remove ongoing GMP, quality, post-market, and change-control responsibilities.
By integrating regulatory strategy into product development and commercialization, manufacturers can reduce avoidable submission problems, improve dossier quality, strengthen ANVISA readiness, and establish a more efficient pathway to the Brazilian medical-device market.
Why Choose Maven Regulatory Solutions?
Maven Regulatory Solutions supports medical-device and IVD companies with ANVISA regulatory strategy, product classification, Brazil market-entry assessment, RDC 830/2023 and RDC 751/2022 compliance, technical dossier review, notification and registration strategy, AFE/CBPF assessment, regulatory submission support, labelling review, post-market change management, revalidation planning, regulatory gap assessments, and lifecycle compliance.
Our Brazil-focused regulatory approach helps global manufacturers and local representatives develop efficient, compliant, and submission-ready strategies for entering and maintaining medical-device and IVD products in the Brazilian market.
Post a comment