February 10, 2026
Health Canada is implementing a major modernization in medical device regulatory submissions. Beginning January 2026, manufacturers of Class II, III, and IV medical devices must use the Regulatory Enrolment Process (REP) in combination with the Common Electronic Submission Gateway (CESG) for regulatory filings.
This shift transforms how medical device applications, regulatory transactions, and company information are managed in Canada. For global manufacturers, early preparation is essential to avoid submission delays, technical rejections, and compliance risks.
Maven Regulatory Solutions outlines what this change means and how device companies should prepare.
What Is Health Canada’s Regulatory Enrolment Process (REP)?
The Regulatory Enrolment Process (REP) is Health Canada’s structured digital system designed to standardize and streamline regulatory data collection. REP replaces traditional email-based submissions and static PDF forms with structured web-based templates and XML data elements.
REP supports submission of:
- Manufacturer and company details
- Device identification and classification
- Dossier and application metadata
- Regulatory transaction tracking
- Contact and correspondent information
What Is CESG (Common Electronic Submission Gateway)?
The Common Electronic Submission Gateway (CESG) is the secure digital transmission channel used to send structured submissions to Health Canada.
REP and CESG work together:
|
System |
Function |
|
REP |
Data entry, structured regulatory information |
|
CESG |
Secure electronic transmission of submission package |
Who Is Affected?
Starting January 2026, the REP becomes mandatory for:
|
Device Class |
Impact |
|
Class II |
License applications & amendments |
|
Class III |
New device licenses & significant changes |
|
Class IV |
High-risk device submissions |
|
All manufacturers |
Regulatory transactions & company data updates |
Email-based submissions will no longer be accepted.
Company XML (CO XML) File Requirement
Health Canada is issuing Company XML (CO XML) files to active companies. This file contains:
- Legal manufacturer information
- Establishment details
- Regulatory correspondent data
- Contact records
Manufacturers must review and update inaccuracies to ensure alignment with REP records.
Why REP Matters for Global Manufacturers
REP aligns with global digital regulatory trends such as:
- Structured regulatory data exchange
- Lifecycle regulatory tracking
- Digital submission ecosystems
- Metadata-driven Regulatory Review
This improves regulatory transparency, review efficiency, and data consistency.
Risks of Non-Compliance
Failure to transition properly may result in:
- Submission rejections
- Licensing delays
- Incomplete regulatory records
- Loss of submission priority
Preparation Steps for 2026
|
Action |
Purpose |
|
Audit company data |
Ensure accuracy in CO XML |
|
Establish CESG account |
Enable secure submissions |
|
Train regulatory teams |
REP template navigation |
|
Align dossier structure |
Match structured data fields |
|
Update SOPs |
Reflect digital submission workflow |
2026 Regulatory Trends Related to REP
- Increased digital regulatory ecosystems
- AI-supported regulatory review tools
- Harmonized submission standards
- Global push toward structured regulatory data
How Maven Regulatory Solutions Supports
Maven helps medical device manufacturers with:
- REP readiness assessment
- CO XML review & data validation
- CESG onboarding support
- Regulatory data structuring
- Health Canada license strategy
- Global submission harmonization
FAQ
Q1: Is REP required for Class I devices?
Primarily focused on Class II–IV licensing and transactions.
Q2: Can submissions still be emailed?
No. CESG transmission becomes mandatory.
Q3: Does REP replace the licensing framework?
No it changes the submission method, not regulatory requirements.
Post a comment