December 13, 2025

As cybersecurity threats escalate across healthcare ecosystems, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is shifting toward stronger post market and premarket oversight of cybersecurity controls in medical devices. While the FDA has not yet released a dedicated Cybersecurity Inspection Guide, precedent from Quality System Inspection Technique (QSIT), Bioresearch Monitoring, and EMC inspection frameworks strongly indicates that a structured cybersecurity inspection model is forthcoming.

For regulatory, quality, and product security teams, 2025 is the critical year to operationalize cybersecurity-by-design, documentation readiness, and vulnerability lifecycle management. Maven Regulatory Solutions supports manufacturers in aligning their cybersecurity systems with evolving FDA expectations under FD&C Act Section 524B, premarket cybersecurity guidance, post market management, SBOM readiness, and secure device lifecycle governance.

Why FDA Cybersecurity Inspections Are Expected in 2025

FDA’s cybersecurity regulatory posture strengthened significantly after Congress amended the FD&C Act via Section 524B. This mandates:

  • Secure-by-design medical device architecture
  • Complete Cybersecurity Management Plans (CMPs)
  • Postmarked vulnerability reporting
  • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) transparency
  • Threat modelling and validated risk assessments

The FDA has publicly communicated that early premarket enforcement is prioritized due to the challenges of post market action. Once premarket systems are aligned, post market cybersecurity inspections will naturally follow — like how QSIT evolved.

What an FDA Cybersecurity Inspection Guide Will Likely Include

Based on FDA precedents + 2023–2025 cybersecurity guidance trends, an FDA inspection guide for medical device cybersecurity would likely cover the following pillars:

• Cybersecurity Risk Management Integration (ISO 14971 + AAMI TIR57 + AAMI TIR97)

Expect scrutiny of threat modelling, hazard analysis links to cybersecurity, and documented reasoning for residual risk acceptability.

• Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF)

Alignment with the FDA’s Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF) approach:

  • secure architecture
  • secure coding
  • authenticated software updates
  • robust access controls
  • end-of-life cybersecurity plans

• SBOM and Patch Management Documentation

Inspectors will expect:

  • SBOM completeness
  • SBOM vulnerability scanning and tracking
  • Patch release processes
  • Vulnerability Communication Plans (VCPs)

• Evidence of Continuous Cybersecurity Monitoring

FDA will likely assess:

  • vulnerability scanning
  • penetration testing results
  • coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD)
  • threat intelligence integration

• Design Controls with Cybersecurity Traceability

Inspectors may request mapping between:

  • security requirements
  • Design outputs
  • verification & validation
  • cybersecurity risk controls
  • post market monitoring outputs

Key Actions Medical Device Manufacturers Should Take Now

Strengthen Cybersecurity-First Quality Systems

Even without a dedicated guide, existing QSIT principles apply. FDA will expect:

  • Design control documentation linking cybersecurity requirements
  • CAPA processes that incorporate cyber risks
  • Supplier controls for software components
  • change management including patch workflows

Establish a Cybersecurity Risk Management Strategy (CRMS)

Include:

  • Threat modelling (STRIDE, DREAD, attack trees)
  • SBOM creation and vulnerability mapping
  • Cryptographic control validation
  • Secure boot and firmware integrity assessments

Implement Comprehensive Cybersecurity Testing

Testing should include:

  • authenticated penetration testing
  • fuzz testing
  • static code analysis (SAST)
  • dynamic application security testing (DAST)
  • validation of cryptographic implementations

Prepare Documentation for Inspection Readiness

Typical FDA requests may include:

  • Cybersecurity risk assessment
  • Secure design architecture
  • Data flow diagrams
  • Cybersecurity risk control verification
  • Patch deployment SOPs
  • Incident response SOPs
  • Third-party software risk evaluation

FDA Cybersecurity Readiness Checklist (2025)

Inspection Area

Expected Evidence

Key Technical Requirement

Cyber Risk Management

Threat modelling, ISO 14971 linkages

STRIDE/DREAD mapping, exploitability scoring

Secure Development Controls

SPDF documentation

Access control, encryption, update validation

SBOM Transparency

Component list, vulnerability status

VEX format, CVE tracking, SBOM automation

Verification & Validation

Cybersecurity test reports

Penetration testing + fuzz testing

post market Surveillance

CVD process, monitoring logs

CVSS scoring, vulnerability lifecycle records

 Core FDA Cybersecurity Elements Under 524B

Requirement

FDA Expectation

Manufacturer Obligations

Cybersecurity Management Plan

Full lifecycle governance

Risk controls, monitoring, incident response

SBOM

Complete, machine-readable, updated

Multi-layer: OS, libraries, dependencies

Patch/Update Process

Timely remediation

Documented SOP, verification evidence

Secure Design

Modern cryptography & access controls

Encryption validation, identity management

post market Reporting

Timely communication of risks

MDR/Corrections & Removals if required

How Maven Regulatory Solutions Supports Cybersecurity Compliance

Maven provides specialized regulatory support for cybersecurity medical devices, including:

  • Cybersecurity gap assessments aligned with FDA 2025 expectations
  • Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF) documentation
  • Threat modelling and cybersecurity risk management
  • SBOM creation, validation, and vulnerability mitigation
  • Premarket submission support (510(k), De Novo, PMA)
  • post market cybersecurity file setup and surveillance planning
  • Inspection readiness and mock audits
  • CAPA development for cybersecurity nonconformities

Maven ensures manufacturers achieve audit-ready, regulator-ready cybersecurity compliance that aligns with global FDA, EU MDR/IVDR, IMDRF, and TIR57/97 expectations.