December 13, 2025
As cybersecurity threats escalate across healthcare ecosystems, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is shifting toward stronger post market and premarket oversight of cybersecurity controls in medical devices. While the FDA has not yet released a dedicated Cybersecurity Inspection Guide, precedent from Quality System Inspection Technique (QSIT), Bioresearch Monitoring, and EMC inspection frameworks strongly indicates that a structured cybersecurity inspection model is forthcoming.
For regulatory, quality, and product security teams, 2025 is the critical year to operationalize cybersecurity-by-design, documentation readiness, and vulnerability lifecycle management. Maven Regulatory Solutions supports manufacturers in aligning their cybersecurity systems with evolving FDA expectations under FD&C Act Section 524B, premarket cybersecurity guidance, post market management, SBOM readiness, and secure device lifecycle governance.
Why FDA Cybersecurity Inspections Are Expected in 2025
FDA’s cybersecurity regulatory posture strengthened significantly after Congress amended the FD&C Act via Section 524B. This mandates:
- Secure-by-design medical device architecture
- Complete Cybersecurity Management Plans (CMPs)
- Postmarked vulnerability reporting
- Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) transparency
- Threat modelling and validated risk assessments
The FDA has publicly communicated that early premarket enforcement is prioritized due to the challenges of post market action. Once premarket systems are aligned, post market cybersecurity inspections will naturally follow — like how QSIT evolved.
What an FDA Cybersecurity Inspection Guide Will Likely Include
Based on FDA precedents + 2023–2025 cybersecurity guidance trends, an FDA inspection guide for medical device cybersecurity would likely cover the following pillars:
• Cybersecurity Risk Management Integration (ISO 14971 + AAMI TIR57 + AAMI TIR97)
Expect scrutiny of threat modelling, hazard analysis links to cybersecurity, and documented reasoning for residual risk acceptability.
• Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF)
Alignment with the FDA’s Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF) approach:
- secure architecture
- secure coding
- authenticated software updates
- robust access controls
- end-of-life cybersecurity plans
• SBOM and Patch Management Documentation
Inspectors will expect:
- SBOM completeness
- SBOM vulnerability scanning and tracking
- Patch release processes
- Vulnerability Communication Plans (VCPs)
• Evidence of Continuous Cybersecurity Monitoring
FDA will likely assess:
- vulnerability scanning
- penetration testing results
- coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD)
- threat intelligence integration
• Design Controls with Cybersecurity Traceability
Inspectors may request mapping between:
- security requirements
- Design outputs
- verification & validation
- cybersecurity risk controls
- post market monitoring outputs
Key Actions Medical Device Manufacturers Should Take Now
Strengthen Cybersecurity-First Quality Systems
Even without a dedicated guide, existing QSIT principles apply. FDA will expect:
- Design control documentation linking cybersecurity requirements
- CAPA processes that incorporate cyber risks
- Supplier controls for software components
- change management including patch workflows
Establish a Cybersecurity Risk Management Strategy (CRMS)
Include:
- Threat modelling (STRIDE, DREAD, attack trees)
- SBOM creation and vulnerability mapping
- Cryptographic control validation
- Secure boot and firmware integrity assessments
Implement Comprehensive Cybersecurity Testing
Testing should include:
- authenticated penetration testing
- fuzz testing
- static code analysis (SAST)
- dynamic application security testing (DAST)
- validation of cryptographic implementations
Prepare Documentation for Inspection Readiness
Typical FDA requests may include:
- Cybersecurity risk assessment
- Secure design architecture
- Data flow diagrams
- Cybersecurity risk control verification
- Patch deployment SOPs
- Incident response SOPs
- Third-party software risk evaluation
FDA Cybersecurity Readiness Checklist (2025)
|
Inspection Area |
Expected Evidence |
Key Technical Requirement |
|
Cyber Risk Management |
Threat modelling, ISO 14971 linkages |
STRIDE/DREAD mapping, exploitability scoring |
|
Secure Development Controls |
SPDF documentation |
Access control, encryption, update validation |
|
SBOM Transparency |
Component list, vulnerability status |
VEX format, CVE tracking, SBOM automation |
|
Verification & Validation |
Cybersecurity test reports |
Penetration testing + fuzz testing |
|
post market Surveillance |
CVD process, monitoring logs |
CVSS scoring, vulnerability lifecycle records |
Core FDA Cybersecurity Elements Under 524B
|
Requirement |
FDA Expectation |
Manufacturer Obligations |
|
Cybersecurity Management Plan |
Full lifecycle governance |
Risk controls, monitoring, incident response |
|
SBOM |
Complete, machine-readable, updated |
Multi-layer: OS, libraries, dependencies |
|
Patch/Update Process |
Timely remediation |
Documented SOP, verification evidence |
|
Secure Design |
Modern cryptography & access controls |
Encryption validation, identity management |
|
post market Reporting |
Timely communication of risks |
MDR/Corrections & Removals if required |
How Maven Regulatory Solutions Supports Cybersecurity Compliance
Maven provides specialized regulatory support for cybersecurity medical devices, including:
- Cybersecurity gap assessments aligned with FDA 2025 expectations
- Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF) documentation
- Threat modelling and cybersecurity risk management
- SBOM creation, validation, and vulnerability mitigation
- Premarket submission support (510(k), De Novo, PMA)
- post market cybersecurity file setup and surveillance planning
- Inspection readiness and mock audits
- CAPA development for cybersecurity nonconformities
Maven ensures manufacturers achieve audit-ready, regulator-ready cybersecurity compliance that aligns with global FDA, EU MDR/IVDR, IMDRF, and TIR57/97 expectations.
Post a comment